Инд. авторы:	Reznikova Z., Levenets J., Panteleeva S., Ryabko B.
Заглавие:	Studying hunting behaviour in the striped field mouse using data compression
Библ. ссылка:	Reznikova Z., Levenets J., Panteleeva S., Ryabko B. Studying hunting behaviour in the striped field mouse using data compression // Acta Ethologica. - 2017. - Vol.20. - Iss. 2. - P.165-173. - ISSN 0873-9749. - EISSN 1437-9546.
Внешние системы:	DOI: 10.1007/s10211-017-0260-9; РИНЦ: 31045053; РИНЦ: 29484155; SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85017479523; WoS: 000401462700009;
Реферат:	eng: We compare predatory behaviour towards a mobile insect in three species of small mammals: the granivorous striped field mouse, the insectivorous common shrew and the Norway rat (a generalist). The striped field mouse displays a surprisingly efficient hunting stereotype. We apply the data compression method (Ryabko et al. Theory Comput Syst 52:133–147, 2013) to compare the complexity of hunting behavioural patterns and to evaluate the flexibility of stereotypes and their succinctness. Norway rats demonstrated the highest level of complexity of hunting behaviour, with the highest proportion of ‘auxiliary’ and ‘noise’ elements and relatively low proportion of ‘key’ elements in their behaviours. The predominance of ‘key’ elements resulted in similarly low levels of complexity of hunting stereotypes in striped field mice and shrews. The similarity between hunting stereotypes of the insectivorous shrew and the granivorous striped field mouse enables us to argue about evolutionary roots of hunting behaviour in small mammals. We show that this method is a useful tool for comparing ethograms as ‘biological texts’. © 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA.
Ключевые слова:	Pattern; Prey; Ethograms; Shrews; Rodents; Insects;
Издано:	2017
Физ. характеристика:	с.165-173
Цитирование:	1. Babińska-Werka J, Gliwicz J, Goszczyński J (1981) Demographic processes in an urban population of the striped field mouse. Acta Theriol 26:275–283 2. Bateson P, Martin PR (1999) Design for a life: how behaviour develops. Jonathan Cape, London 3. Beecher MD (1989) Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach. Anim Behav 38:248–261 4. Calhoun JB (1962) The ecology and sociobiology of the Norway rat. Public Health Service Publication, Washington D.C., p 288 5. Casarrubea M, Sorbera F, Crescimanno G (2009) Multivariate data handling in the study of rat behavior: an integrated approach. Behav Res Methods 41:772–781. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.772 6. Casarrubea M, Jonsson GK, Faulisi F, Sorbera F, Di Giovanni G, Benigno A, Benigno A, Crescimanno G, Magnusson MS (2015) T-pattern analysis for the study of temporal structure of animal and human behavior: a comprehensive review. J Neurosci Methods 239:34–46. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.024 7. Churchfield S, Rychlik L, Taylor JR (2012) Food resources and foraging habits of the common shrew, Sorex araneus: does winter food shortage explain Dehnel’s phenomenon? Oikos 121:1593–1602. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20462.x 8. Fedderwitz F, Björklund N, Ninkovic V, Nordlander G (2015) The structure of feeding behavior in a phytophagous insect (Hylobius abietis). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 155:229–239. doi:10.1111/eea.12302 9. Forrester GS (2008) A multidimensional approach to investigations of behaviour: revealing structure in animal communication signals. Anim Behav 76:1749–1760. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.026 10. Gammie SC, Hasen NS, Rhodes JS, Girard I, Garland T (2003) Predatory aggression, but not maternal or intermale aggression, is associated with high voluntary wheel-running behavior in mice. Horm Behav 44:209–221 11. Gattermann R, Fritzsche P, Neumann K, Al-Hussein I, Kayser A, Abiad M, Yakti R (2001) Notes on the current distribution and the ecology of wild golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). J Zool 254:359–365. doi:10.1017/S0952836901000851 12. Gauvrit N, Zenil H, Delahaye JP, Soler-Toscano F (2014) Algorithmic complexity for short binary strings applied to psychology: a primer. Behav Res Methods 46:732–744. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0416-0 13. Kershenbaum A, Blumstein DT, Roch MA et al (2014) Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus. Biol Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.12160 14. Landry SO (1970) The Rodentia as omnivores. Q Rev Biol 45:351–372 15. Langley WM (1994) Comparison of predatory behaviors of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). J Comp Psychol 108:394 16. MacNulty DR, Mech LD, Smith DW (2007) A proposed ethogram of large-carnivore predatory behavior, exemplified by the wolf. J Mammalogy 88:595–605. doi:10.1644/06-MAMM-A-119R1.1 17. Magnusson MS (2000) Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behav Res Methods 32:93–110. doi:10.3758/BF03200792 18. Martin PR, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 19. McCowan B, Doyle LR, Hanser SF (2002) Using information theory to assess the diversity, complexity, and development of communicative repertoires. J Compar Psychol 116:166. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.116.2.166 20. Oller DK, Griebel U (2008) Evolution of communicative flexibility: complexity, creativity, and adaptability in human and animal communication. MIT Press (MA), London 21. Panteleeva S, Reznikova Z, Vygonyailova O (2013) Quantity judgments in the context of risk/reward decision making in striped field mice: first “count,” then hunt. Front Psychol 4:53. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00053 22. Pollard KA, Blumstein DT (2012) Evolving communicative complexity: insights from rodents and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 367:1869–1878. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0221 23. Polsky RH (1977) The ontogeny of predatory behaviour in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus A. auratus). I. The influence of age and experience. Behaviour 61:26–56. doi:10.1163/156853977X00478 24. Reznikova Z (2007) Animal intelligence: from individual to social cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 25. Reznikova Z, Panteleeva S, Danzanov Z (2012) A new method for evaluating the complexity of animal behavioral patterns based on the notion of Kolmogorov complexity, with ants’ hunting behavior as an example. Neurocomputing 84:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.019 26. Ryabko B, Reznikova Z (1996) Using Shannon entropy and Kolmogorov complexity to study the communicative system and cognitive capacities in ants. Complexity 2:37–42 27. Ryabko D, Schmidhuber J (2009) Using data compressors to construct order tests for homogeneity and component independence. Appl Math Lett 22:1029–1032. doi:10.1016/j.aml.2008.01.008 28. Ryabko B, Reznikova Z, Druzyaka A, Panteleeva S (2013) Using ideas of Kolmogorov complexity for studying biological texts. Theory of Computing Systems 52:133–147. doi:10.1007/s00224-012-9403-6 29. Saarikko J (1989) Foraging behaviour of shrews. Ann Zool Fenn 26:411–423 30. Sadowska ET, Baliga-Klimczyk K, Chrząścik KM, Koteja P (2008) Laboratory model of adaptive radiation: a selection experiment in the bank vole. Physiol Biochem Zool 81:627–640. doi:10.1086/590164 31. Sadowska ET, Stawski C, Rudolf A et al (2015) Evolution of basal metabolic rate in bank voles from a multidirectional selection experiment. Proc Biol Sci 282:20150025. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0025 32. Sarko DK, Leitch DB, Girard I, Sikes RS, Catania KC (2011) Organization of somatosensory cortex in the northern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys leucogaster), a predatory rodent. J Comp Neurol 519:64–74. doi:10.1002/cne.22504 33. Timberlake W, Washburne DL (1989) Feeding ecology and laboratory predatory behavior toward live and artificial moving prey in seven rodent species. Anim Learn Behav 17:2–11. doi:10.3758/BF03205206 34. Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, London 35. Vogel P (1976) Energy consumption of European and African shrews. Acta Theriol 21:195–206 36. Whelton JP, O’Boyle M (1977) Early experience and the development of predatory and intraspecific aggression in mice. Anim Learn Behav 5:291–296 37. Whishaw IQ, Kolb B (2004) The behavior of the laboratory rat: a handbook with tests. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162851.001.0001