Инд. авторы:	Vishnevsky O.V., Putinsev N.I., Zapara T.A., Ratushnyak A.S.
Заглавие:	Analysis of the cognitive properties of neural systems based on biofeedback
Библ. ссылка:	Vishnevsky O.V., Putinsev N.I., Zapara T.A., Ratushnyak A.S. Analysis of the cognitive properties of neural systems based on biofeedback // Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research. - 2015. - Vol.5. - Iss. 6. - P.609-615. - ISSN 2079-0597. - EISSN 2079-0600.
Внешние системы:	DOI: 10.1134/S2079059715060179; РИНЦ: 26924055;
Реферат:	eng: Problems of cognitive system reengineering, i.e., the development of devices with cognitive properties on the basis of their biological prototypes, cannot be solved without understanding the basic features of the architecture of biological systems, information properties, and molecular organization of the primitive units forming the architecture: nerve cells. The construction of learning models makes it possible to study the activity of individual cells, not only in terms of behavioral responses to natural stimuli but also in experiments on isolated preparations with excitation of peripheral bodies and isolated cell structures. The software-tool complex NeuroFeedBack was developed; it includes a system of living neurons and a neurocomputer interface feedback. The complex provides the reception and processing of input signals from neurons, their visualization and storage, as well as the generation of output reinforcing stimuli applied to the neurons. Analysis of the functional activity of neurons of the right parietal ganglion of the Lymnaea stagnalis mollusk was performed with the complex in three models of reinforcement. It was shown that optimization of neural activity occurred under conditions of biofeedback, allowing the neuron to minimize the quantity of the reinforcing stimuli. The results provided grounds for the design of a hybrid robotic system in which living neural systems using a neurocomputer interface could solve navigation tasks, controlling a real-time mechanoelectronical device operating in a real environment. In the experiment, the use of the proposed programs of hybrid reinforcements allowed the robot to find a glowing light bulb and reach it in a few minutes.
Ключевые слова:	neuron; neural network; biofeedback; Hybrid robot; cognitive features;
Издано:	2015
Физ. характеристика:	с.609-615
Цитирование:	1. Alkon, D.L., Changes of membrane currents during learning, J. Exp. Biol., 1984, vol. 112, pp. 95–112. 2. Bakkum, D.J., Shkolnik, A.C., Ben-Ary, G., et al., Removing some ‘A’ from AI: embodied cultured networks, embodied artificial intelligence, Lecture Notes Computer Sci., 2004, vol. 3139, pp. 130–145. 3. Bakkum, D.J., Gamblen, P.M., Ben-Ary, B., Chao, Z.C., and Potter, S.M., MEART: the semi-living artist, Front. Neurorobotics, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 1–10. 4. Balaban, P.M. and Bravarenko, N.I., Postsynaptic calcium contributes to reinforcement in a three-neuron network exhibiting associative plasticity, Eur. J. Neurosci., 2004, vol. 19, pp. 227–233. 5. Cozzi, L., D’Angelo, P., Chiappalone, M., et al., Coding and decoding of information in a bi-directional neural interface, Neurocomputing, 2005, vols. 65–66, pp. 783–792. 6. Demarse, T.B., Wagenaar, D., Blau, A.W., and Potter, S.M., The neurally controlled animat: biological brains acting with simulated bodies, Auton. Robots, 2001, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 305–310. 7. Hayashi, I., Kiyotoki, M., Kiyohara, A., Tokuda, M., and Kudoh, S.N., Acquisition of logicality in living neuronal networks and its operation to fuzzy bio-robot system, Fuzz-Ieee, 2010, pp. 1–7. 8. Hayashi, I., Kiyotoki, M., Kiyohara, A., Tokuda, M., and Kudoh, S.N., Fuzzy bio-interface: indicating logicality from living neuronal network and learning control of bio-robot, in Intern. Joint. Conf. on Neural Networks, 2011, pp. 2417–2423. 9. Kendel, E., Kletochnye osnovy povedeniya (Cellular Basis of Behavior), Moscow: Mir, 1980. 10. Kostenko, M.A., Isolation of single nerve cells of the brain of the mollusk Limnaea stagnalis for further culturing them in vitro, Tsitologiya, 1972, vol. 14, pp. 1274–1278. 11. Kostyuk, P.G., The problem of reactivity and recent advances in neurophysiology, in Fiziologicheskie nauki–meditsine (Physiological Sciences for Medicine), Leningrad: Nauka, 1983, pp. 5–10. 12. Kotlyar, B.I., Plastichnost’ nervnoi sistemy (The Plasticity of the Nervous System), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1986. 13. Kudoh, S.N., Taguchi, T., and Hayashi, I., Interaction and intelligence in living neuronal networks connected to moving robot, Fuzz-Ieee, 2006, pp. 1162–1166. 14. Kudoh, S.N., Tokuda, M., Kiyohara, A., Hosokawa, C., Taguchi, T., and Hayashi, I., Vitroid—the robot system with an interface between a living neuronal network and outer world, Int. J. Mechatron. Manufact. Syst., 2011, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 135–149. 15. Kyriakides, M., McCrohan, C.R., Slade, C.T., et al., The morphology and electrophysiology of the neurons of the paired pedal ganglia of Lymnaea stagnalis (L.), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Comp. Physiol., 1989, vol. 93, pp. 861–876. 16. Mozzachiodi, R. and Byrne, J.H., More than synaptic plasticity: role of nonsynaptic plasticity in learning and memory, Trends Neurosci., 2010, vol. 33, pp. 17–26. 17. Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Alford, S.T., Chiappalone, M., et al., New perspectives on the dialogue between brains and machines, Front. Neurosci., 2010, vol. 4. doi: 10.3389/ neuro.01.008.2010 18. Novellino, A., D’Angelo, P., Cozzi, L., et al., Connecting neurons to a mobile robot: an in vitro bidirectional neural interface, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2007, p. 2725. doi: 10.1155/2007/12725 19. Ratushnyak, A.S., Voskrecenskaya, L.V., Pankov, T.M., and Stark, M.B., “Adaptive” trace reactions of hippocampal neurons in tissue culture, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1976, vol. 228, pp. 1479–1481. 20. Shkolnik, A.C., Neurally controlled simulated robot: applying cultured neurons to pandle and approach/ avoidance task in real time, and a framework for studying learning in vitro, S.M. Potter, J. Lu, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory Univ., Atlanta, 2003. 21. Syed, N.I., Bulloch, A.G., and Lukowiak, K., In vitro reconstruction of the respiratory central pattern generator of the mollusk Lymnaea, Science, 1990, vol. 250, pp. 282–285. 22. Tessadori, J., Bisio, M., Martinoia, S., and Chiappalone, M., Modular neuronal assemblies embodied in a closedloop environment: toward future integration of brains and machines, Front. Neural Circuits, 2012, vol. 6, p. 99. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00099. Epub December 12, 2012. 23. Vasilevskii, N.N., Suvorov, N.B., and Trubachev, V.V., Sustainable change in frequency and timing of discharges of cortical neuronal populations in experiments with feedback, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1972, vol. 206, pp. 510–512. 24. Verbnyi, Ya.I. and Mogilevskii, A.Ya., A possible mechanism of plastic rearrangements of neural activity in different regimes of intracellular electrical stimulation according to the methods of system analysis, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat. Im. I.P. Pavlova, 1993, vol. 43, pp. 129–138. 25. Warwick, K., Xydas, D., and Nasuto, S.J., Controlling a mobile robot with a biological brain, Def. Sci. J., 2010, vol. 1, pp. 5–14.